How to navigate Indian FDI regulations

India’s regulatory framework on foreign direct investment (FDI) in retail is one of the most complex in the world.

But, the reward for navigating the perplexing Indian FDI regulations is gaining access to one of the world’s fastest-growing consumer markets.

This article outlines India’s regulatory landscape for FDI in retail while offering suggestions on how foreign businesses can successfully maneuver through them.

Types of retail

The Indian government categorises retail into two types: single-brand and multi-brand.

As the names suggest, single-brand retail refers to businesses that sell only a single brand of goods to consumers. Multi-brand retail refers to businesses that sell multiple brands through one outlet such as Wal-Mart.

If a foreign business owns more than one brand, that business has to apply for FDI approval for each individual brand. A foreign company cannot sell these brands in the same outlet.

Single-brand retail

The Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) permits 49 per cent of FDI into single-brand retail under the ‘automatic route’ and 100 per cent FDI with government approval. To obtain government approval for 100 per cent FDI, foreign retailers must comply with the following conditions:

  • Their brand must be internationally used and recognised.
  • The ‘branding’ of the product must occur during the manufacturing process.
  • The investor must be the owner of the brand.
  • A minimum of 30 per cent of the material used to make these products must be sourced in India within the first five years of establishing a retail outlet.

The 30 per cent Indian sourcing minimum is the most difficult condition for foreign businesses to comply with.

For instance, the requirement disqualifies luxury products with place-specific sourcing needs. Furthermore, vulnerable supply chains and inconsistent quality control makes it difficult for foreign retailers to depend on domestic sourcing.

Multi-brand retail

Currently, India allows 51 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail, 100 per cent FDI into multi-brand food retail, and 100 per cent FDI into e-commerce retail. All three categories require government approval with stringent conditions.

To obtain approval for the general category of multi-brand retail, foreign businesses must invest a minimum of US$100 million with 50 per cent of their investment going into backend infrastructure within the first three years. Furthermore, the company can only sell products made in India – giving their domestic competitors a huge advantage.

So far, only British-based Tesco has established multi-brand retail outlets in India under these conditions. In partnership with the Tata Group’s Trent Hypermarkets, Tesco has established its India outlets in Maharashtra and Karnataka, under the brand name Star Bazaar and Star Market.

To obtain approval for 100 per cent FDI into multi-brand food retail, retail outlets are restricted to exclusively selling food. These food items must be either produced or processed in India.

Recently, the DIPP approved Amazon’s investment request for multi-brand retail in food. Amazon will invest US$515 million in food retail over the next five years.

Multi-brand e-commerce

FDI into multi-brand e-commerce falls under the automatic route. But, e-commerce companies have to abide by the ‘marketplace model’ and cannot act as a retailer themselves. This means that no more than 25 per cent of an e-commerce platform’s sales can go to a single company. E-commerce companies cannot invest in inventory.

The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has been inconsistent in its attitude towards FDI in multi-brand retail.

The BJP’s 2014 election manifesto opposed FDI into multi-brand retail though it never tightened the existing regulations established by the previous regime. Federal ministers have hinted at easing these regulations further but the government has not made any official announcements.

Navigating FDI regulations in retail

Successfully navigating through the complex Indian FDI regulations on retail means more decision-making autonomy and increased potential of profits for foreign companies. While India’s sourcing norms on single-brand retail create barriers for many companies entering the Indian market, they also pose opportunities for foreign businesses to solidify their Indian presence.  

India is making slow, inconsistent progress at easing regulatory norms on retail – establishing a presence now will position foreign businesses to greatly benefit from future changes in the regulatory landscape.

India badly needs more efficient, simplified supply chains. Though the sourcing norms on single-brand retail are stringent, cultivating supply sources means greater quality-control. Foreign businesses cultivating their own sourcing will protect themselves from subsequent efficiency leakages and supply chain disruptions.

Foreign retail companies can also team with Indian partners who can later become suppliers. Foreign retail companies can set up wholly-owned outlets in India once their partnership succeeds.

Finally, the Indian government’s exact criteria on sourcing norms lacks transparency. Companies which manufacture “state of the art” or “cutting edge” technologies are exempt; however, what cutting edge means remains ambiguous.

When Elon Musk tweeted that India’s rigid sourcing norms were creating obstacles in making Tesla cars in India, the Indian government tweeted back. Under the @makeinindia twitter handle, the government clarified to Musk that his manufacturing would not require minimum local sourcing requirements.

Conversely, Apple has urged the Indian government to exempt them from the sourcing norm. However, in May 2016, the Finance Ministry rejected this recommendation: granting Apple permission to set up single-brand retail without any relaxation in the sourcing norm.

When it comes to navigating India’s regulatory system, public attention pays off.

  • This article was first published on Asia Briefing.  Since its establishment in 1992, Dezan Shira & Associates has been guiding foreign clients through Asia’s complex regulatory environment and assisting them with all aspects of legal, accounting, tax, internal control, HR, payroll, and audit matters. As a full-service consultancy with operational offices across China, Hong Kong, India, and ASEAN, it is an ideal partner for business expansion in this region and beyond.  Further information:

You have 7 articles remaining. Unlock 15 free articles a month, it’s free.